Sources & process
How our research is produced
Research that can be inspected
InfluencerQ publishes educational market research for stock and crypto traders. The useful product is a clear question, credible evidence and an explanation of what would change the conclusion.
Our current work uses AI for research, source inspection, calculations, writing and presentation. Source checking is also AI-assisted. There has been no independent human expert review, and we claim no named analyst credentials or verified trading track record.
Our evidence standard
- Define the question and sample. State the period, venue, instruments, exclusions and relevant timing before interpreting the result.
- Expose the inputs. Link primary disclosures and data requests. Retain observation dates and disclose unavailable evidence.
- Make the calculation reproducible. Publish safe public-data notebooks and definitions; use independent checks for numerical findings.
- Challenge the conclusion. Compare alternative windows and benchmarks, state costs and assumptions, and identify reversal conditions.
- Keep the history honest. Preserve the original publication date. Label corrections and subsequent follow-ups separately.
Transparency in practice
The BTC/ETH case study includes daily observations, a source register, an executable marimo notebook and an independent calculation check. Its public sample controls display calculated results for fixed windows. The downloadable notebook lets you rerun the analysis and explore a stated fee assumption.
These artifacts show how the analysis was produced. They do not establish forecasting ability, independent certification or future returns. The data cutoff remains visible even when the article is newly published.
Reviewing the older archive
We recovered 41 existing articles and retained their URLs and original dates. Three priority articles now contain dated substantive corrections, including withdrawal of empirical claims whose supporting records were not available. Other legacy articles are labeled historical and awaiting evidence review; they are not promoted as verified findings or included in the current research sitemap until reviewed.
Browse the archive and correction status.
Questions and corrections
Use the private research enquiry to identify a statement, its source and the issue. Save the returned private link to follow the response; email is optional. Material factual changes receive a dated note. A submission is free and creates no paid obligation.
Research describes evidence and scenarios. It does not provide individualized investment instructions, execute trades or guarantee outcomes. Product terms define any future paid purchase separately.